Showing posts with label wolf habitat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wolf habitat. Show all posts

Sunday, March 14, 2021

Wondering About Wolves: An AudioPost


I want to tell you a story of wondering about wolves.

One day Mary, our friend Leo, and I follow a snow-covered service road to the edge of Yellowstone’s Blacktail Deer Plateau. Our plan—if you can call it that—is to walk as far as we want onto the plateau. Little snow has fallen in the last couple of cold weeks so our hiking boots crunch on shallow snow as we proceed.

Within a hundred yards, Leo finds the tracks of a single wolf; they look fresh... To listen to the rest:



HTML5 Audio Player
This reading based on a chapter of the best selling Deep into Yellowstone.

Photo Credits:
Photo of wolf tracks by Rick Lamplugh

Rick Lamplugh writes, photographs, and speaks to protect wildlife and wild lands.

His bestselling In the Temple of Wolves; its sequel, Deep into Yellowstone; and its prequel, The Wilds of Aging are available signed. His books are also available unsigned or as eBook or audiobook on Amazon.

Signed Sets Available



Monday, November 9, 2020

How Wolves Arrived and Once Flourished in the U.S.

As you probably have heard, the US Fish and Wildlife Service has delisted gray wolves across the Lower 48. This means that the management of wolves will be given to each individual state. Sadly, in most states “management” means “killing.” This delisting will be fought in the courts by a number of conservation organizations. Hopefully—by supporting these organizations and raising our voices—the delisting will be overturned. Today I begin a series of posts that help explain why protecting wolves is so important. Each post will end with a link to a site where you can show your support for wolves. Here's the amazing story of how wolves arrived and once flourished here.


More than 100,000 years ago, Canis lupus, the essential predators we call gray wolves, were following their four-legged food supply through Eurasia.  They came upon the Bering Land Bridge that connected Siberia with Alaska. The name “bridge” misleads. This land bridge was not long and thin like a highway bridge. It was more of a dry subcontinent, called Beringia, that was about five times the size of present day Alaska. Beringia’s cold-hardy vegetation drew many grazers and hungry wolves followed.


When gray wolves reached North America, they turned and travelled south into what we now call the Lower 48. There they encountered dire wolves (Canis dirus), the then dominant wolf in North America. Dire wolves had appeared abruptly and fully evolved across North America thousands of years earlier, according to Ronald Nowak, writing in Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. He speculates that dire wolves migrated here from South America. 


While we tend to picture dire wolves as huge, Nowak contends they varied in size. Some were the biggest wolves ever; others were smaller, about the size of a large gray wolf. Dire wolves had massive heads, huge teeth, and short legs relative to their body size. Though fossilized remains of these wolves have been found across the Lower 48, dire wolves seemed to prefer a warmer climate; they never migrated to the northern reaches of the Lower 48 (such as Montana, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin), leaving that territory to Canis lupus as gray wolves entered from Beringia.


Map by William Harris. (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The dire wolf disappeared about 8,000 years ago along with some of its large prey, the mastodons, wooly mammoths, and camels that had been plentiful in North America during the Ice Age. But not all ancient herbivores perished, writes James Bailey in American Plains Bison: Rewilding an Icon. Ancestors of Yellowstone’s bison survived this mass extinction, as did elk and caribou, moose and musk ox, and bighorn sheep and mountain goats.


The dire wolf’s disappearance may have been caused, writes Nowak, by increasing numbers of humans taking the dire wolf’s prey. Or dire wolves may have been outcompeted by gray wolves and red wolves (Canis rufus), both better suited to hunting the relatively smaller and faster prey that was becoming prevalent as large herbivores vanished. (Red wolves had crossed the Bering Land Bridge long before gray wolves and howled in the eastern and southeastern US.)


Whatever the cause, the dire wolf’s extinction left gray wolves as the dominant wolf in North America. With plenty of game to dine upon, Canis lupus flourished. “Its range,” writes Nowak, “was more extensive than that of any other terrestrial mammal.” Except humans.


Eventually, these ubiquitous gray wolves began to morph into five subspecies of Canis lupus as each type of wolf slowly adapted to its specific habitat, prey, and climate. This adaptation led to the development of the different sizes and behaviors seen in these five subspecies. 


The arctic wolf (Canis lupus arctos) inhabited the cold far north. The northwestern wolf (Canis lupus occidentalis) roamed Alaska and western Canada. The plains wolf (Canis lupus nubilus) claimed the largest territory, a wide swath from Oregon to Newfoundland and from Hudson Bay to Texas. The eastern wolf (Canis lupus lycaon) had the smallest range, prowling a compact, football-shaped portion of the northeastern US and southeastern Canada. The Mexican wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) stalked its prey in Mexico and the deep southwestern US.


This North American suite of millions of wolves would remain healthy and complete until we humans came to conquer the continent. Then the killing of wolves began. And hasn’t stopped.


The plains wolf was killed off by 1926.


The Mexican gray wolf—killed off in New Mexico by 1927—is endangered with more wolves living in captive breeding programs than in the wild. 


The red wolf was driven to near extinction by the mid-1900s and remains critically endangered.


The remaining eastern wolves are protected in both the US and Canada. There is a scientific debate, according to the International Wolf Center, that some or all the wolves in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan are eastern wolves (Canis lupus lycaon). 


The arctic wolf survives in Canada’s Queen Elizabeth Islands. 


Map from Center for Biological Diversity


The northwestern wolf ranges from Canada into the northwestern US, including Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and California. This population grew in the Lower 48 after reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone and Idaho. The population also increased under protection of the Endangered Species Act—the very protection that the USFWS is removing. But as the map shows, wolves now survive in only a tiny portion of their historic range. They are not recovered. They need protection.


In an upcoming post, I’ll describe how two million wolves disappeared from the Lower 48.


Here’s a site to visit if you want to tell the governors of states with wolves to act in a way that helps wolves recover. 



Rick Lamplugh writes and photographs to protect wildlife and wild lands.


His bestselling In the Temple of Wolves; its sequel, Deep into Yellowstone; and its prequel, The Wilds of Aging are available signed

His books are also available unsigned or as eBook or audiobook on Amazon.

Monday, November 11, 2019

Road Trip Journal: Wondering About Wolves



10/8/19: We arrived yesterday at Kabetogama State Forest in the North Woods of Minnesota. The campground we chose has 61 spaces, none occupied. Happy to be alone, we selected a site, set up our teardrop trailer, and went for a walk. The fall color change is peaking in this diverse forest. Dark green conifers highlight bright orange, red, and yellow deciduous trees. Soft sunlight creates contrast while an almost cloudless sky provides a stunning backdrop.

We reach the shore of Kabetogama Lake where reflections capture our eyes and steal our breath. Mary and I quietly dance around each other, cameras clicking, as we try to capture moments of color and texture, movement and reflection.

As the sun sets and the light fades, we meander to our camper and climb in for a quiet evening. While Mary works with photos, I study our road atlas and maps that show the locations of wolf packs in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. I’m still refining—as I was before we left Montana—the best route through the wolf country in each of the Great Lakes states. 

I don’t expect to see a wolf as we drive or walk in this wolf territory. Maybe we'll be lucky enough to hear one howl when we camp near areas that researchers say have lots of wolves. What I do want to see on this trip is the wolf territory in these three states where more than 4,000 wolves live. So far, their territory is covered with forests of diverse and closely packed trees: pines, spruces, firs, and junipers; aspens, oaks, birches, ash, and maples. When we peer into the dark understory, we can't help but wonder how wolves can run down prey amongst the close-set trunks. 


But one thing has become clear: Minnesota wolves seek public land—state forests, national forests, a national park and a wilderness area—and avoid private land. As I study the map of recent Minnesota wolf sightings, the little black spots indicating wolf observations freckle public lands and avoid the few towns and stretches of private lands.

This shouldn’t surprise me; public land is the only home left for wolves wherever they’re allowed to live. But the small number of acres of public land and the large number of wolves in the Great Lakes states does surprise me. And makes me think of Colorado, where a battle rages about reintroducing wolves.

As we view mile after mile of northern Minnesota forest, I can’t help but wonder what western Colorado will look like. We will eventually get there before this 6,000 mile road trip ends around November 1. Once in Colorado, another of our goals is to explore one of the three areas where wolves might be released—if the reintroduction occurs.

To find territory that Colorado wolves might gravitate to, I researched elk hunting units in southern Wyoming and northwestern Colorado. Elk abound in each area, according to the fish and game departments of both states and several web sites dedicated to helping hunters find elk to kill. I figure that if there are plenty of elk to shoot, there are plenty of elk for wolves to bring down. And, unfortunately, there will be plenty of resistance by elk hunters to the reintroduction of elk-eating wolves. 

Another point of contention in the reintroduction is the claim that there is not enough human-free space left for wolves in Colorado. Checking the reality of that claim is one reason we are touring wolf country in Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Each of these states is more densely packed with people than western Colorado. Yet each supports a resident wolf population.


I’m heartened by what I’ve seen so far. Somehow more than 4,000 wolves have found a way to hunt and mate and raise young and disperse in these Great Lakes states. And the people living in this wolf country have found a way—however tentative or tumultuous it may be—to coexist with wolves for more than 40 years. No doubt the protection still provided by the Endangered Species Act helps. Just as that protection would help in Colorado.  

In the end though, I don’t think a lack of wolf habitat or an abundance of people will decide the fate of Colorado wolves. The key factor will be whether the residents of western Colorado are willing to coexist with a couple hundred wolves. 

I have no doubt that coexistence is possible: the abundant wolves and residents of the Great Lakes states show that.


Photo Credit: Wolf photo by USFWS. Other photos by Rick Lamplugh and Mary Strickroth

Rick Lamplugh writes, photographs, and speaks to protect wildlife and wild lands.

His bestselling In the Temple of Wolves; its sequel, Deep into Yellowstone; and its prequel, The Wilds of Aging are available signed. His books are also available unsigned or as eBook or audiobook on Amazon.

Signed Sets Available

Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Good News for Washington Wolves



Our actions make a difference! Washington’s Department of Fish and Wildlife has killed wolves regularly despite the outrage of citizens, advocates, and conservation groups. On September 30, Governor Inslee directed WDFW to change their wolf-killing ways. Here are some excerpts from his letter to Kelly Susewind, WDFW Director.

*****

“I write to ask that you make changes in the gray wolf recovery program to further increase the reliance on non-lethal methods, and to significantly reduce the need for lethal removal of this species.”

“For reasons that are not entirely clear, numerous conflicts with livestock producers have occurred in a handful of federal grazing allotments.”

“I share the public’s concern and am troubled that the Wolf Plan does not appear to be working as intended in this particular area in Northeastern Washington. I believe we cannot continue using the same management approach on this particular landscape…The status quo of annual lethal removal is simply unacceptable.”

“…please consider what opportunities exist to work with the U.S. Forest Service and other public land managers to make changes that would reduce the conflicts, including changes in allotment policies for public lands that are prime wolf habitat…”

*****

Thank you, Governor Inslee, for listening to your citizens and working to help wolves survive on public lands—the only home available to them.

And an even bigger thanks to all the citizens, advocates, and conservation organizations who called, wrote, and spoke to the governor. Your voice made the difference!

Here is a list of 26 wolves killed at the request of one ranch, the Diamond M Ranch, in Northeastern Washington. (list by Predator Defense)

2012 – 7 Wedge Pack wolves
2016 – 7 Profanity Peak Pack wolves
2017 – 1 Sherman Pack wolf
2018 – 2 Old Profanity Territory Pack wolves
2018 - 1 Smackout Pack wolf
2019 – 8 Old Profanity Territory Pack wolves

I sincerely hope that WDFW and the USFS decide to move livestock off this ranch’s grazing allotment which is in prime wolf habitat. And if Diamond M Ranch does have to move its livestock to another allotment and continues to lose livestock to wolves, I think that the rancher’s privilege of grazing his cattle on public land should be suspended.

To learn more about a plan to keep wolves and livestock separate and alive on public lands, read my post Managing Wolves Requires Managing Cattle

To Read the Governor’s Letter.

Award-winning Indie author Rick Lamplugh writes, speaks, and photographs to protect wildlife and wild lands. His bestselling In the Temple of Wolves and the award-winning sequel, Deep into Yellowstone, are available signed from Rick or unsigned on Amazon.



Rick's new book, The Wilds of Aging, is the prequel to In the Temple of Wolves and is available signed or on Amazon.



Photo by Rick Lamplugh

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

PART 3: The Battle to Bring Wolves Back to Colorado



PART 3: Does Colorado Have Room for Wolves?

There’s a movement to reintroduce wolves, and there’s a movement to keep them out. Both anti-reintroduction folks and wolf supporters concerned with wolf safety claim there’s not enough room. How does Colorado compare to other wolf states? Here are some claims and comparisons.

The Claim: Colorado is Too Crowded

Colorado has 5.6 million people and covers 103,000 square miles. Wolves would be reintroduced into the less populated western half of the state.

Minnesota with more than 2600 wolves also has 5.6 million people. And they live in less space (80,000 square miles). Most of their wolves roam the less populated northern part of the state. All are protected by the Endangered Species Act.

Washington with more than 125 wolves has more people (7.5 million) than Colorado. And less space (66,000 square miles). Most of the wolves roam in the less populated eastern third of the state where they are not protected by the ESA.

The Claim: Colorado Does Not Have Enough Public Land

If we’re to have wolf recovery, it must happen on public land, the only home left to wolves. How does Colorado compare with some other wolf states in terms of amount of public land? 

Thirty-nine percent of Colorado is public land. That’s more than 40,000 square miles with no permanent wolf population.

Seventeen percent of Minnesota is public land. That’s just 13,600 square miles. Yet more than 2600 wolves manage to live in the state.

Thirty-six percent of Washington is public land. That’s just 24,000 square miles. More than 125 wolves live there.

The Claim: Colorado Has Too Many Cattle

Colorado has 2.8 million cattle and no permanent wolf population. 

Wisconsin has 3.4 million cattle. Have that state’s 900 wolves harmed Wisconsin’s cattle producers? Wisconsin lost 30 cattle to wolves according to the most recent report. Another eight were injured.

Oregon has 1.3 million cattle and lost just 17 to their 137 wolves in 2018.

Wolves will likely take some cattle in Colorado, especially on public land. But the number taken will not be enough to ruin the livestock industry. And the proposed Colorado wolf reintroduction plan requires reimbursing producers for losses to wolves.

There Is Scientific Support for a Colorado Wolf Reintroduction

Several years ago three scientists, John Vucetich, Jeremy Bruskotter, and Michael Nelson, published a journal paper “A Framework for Envisioning Gray Wolf Recovery.” The scientists state that wolf recovery is feasible in the Lower 48, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service should develop a NATIONAL WOLF RECOVERY PLAN. 

The scientists calculated that wolves will recover best where fewer than 142 of us humans crowd each square kilometer. They produced a map (accompanies this post) that shows these areas with too many humans freckle the Lower 48’s eastern half, but the West has few. 

Their map also reveals where wolves could live, even if reintroduction is necessary. Three potential recovery areas are in the West. One of them is in less populated western Colorado where the battle to reintroduce is under way.

After considering the claims and comparisons, it seem to me that Colorado has enough room to bring back wolves that lived in the state until the mid-1940s. The real question is whether some Coloradans—like some people in other wolf states—are willing to coexist with this essential predator.



Award-winning Indie author Rick Lamplugh writes, speaks, and photographs to protect wildlife and wild lands. His bestselling In the Temple of Wolves and the award-winning sequel, Deep into Yellowstone, are available signed from Rick or unsigned on Amazon.



Rick's new book, The Wilds of Aging, is the prequel to In the Temple of Wolves and is available signed or on Amazon.




Map of wolf recovery by Vucetich et al.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

How Is Killing Coexisting?



Four more members of the Old Profanity Territory pack were gunned down on August 16 by Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) shooters. Their deaths came just hours before a judge put the kill order on hold, ruling a trial necessary to determine if Diamond M Ranch met the requirement for using non-lethal deterrents before wolves were targeted. I applaud the judge but feel sad for the waste of wolves.

It’s easy to spew anger at the one rancher behind these wolf losses. His inability or unwillingness to coexist, to use effective non-lethal deterrents, has cost the lives of many cattle and now 26 wolves on his public lands grazing allotments. The rancher is reimbursed for the loss of cattle, gets some of his investment back. No one can bring back the wolves killed on our public land, the only home available to them. 

But if we’re going to coexist with wolves, a species that has roamed this country far longer than we have, we have to look beyond anger. And we don’t have to look far to question the motivation and actions of WDFW. It seems obvious that killing wolves on the same grazing allotment over a seven-year period would make the agency doubt the effectiveness of their approach, admit the area is wolf habitat not cattle pasture, and move the cattle. Instead WDFW keeps shooting, claiming they are just following orders, the prescribed Wolf-Livestock Interaction Protocol.

I’ve read their current protocol and found abundant mentions of killing wolves as a way to end conflict. I found a few mentions of coexisting. I found NO mention of moving cattle away from an allotment proven unsuitable for grazing. Why is killing the primary tool for coexisting? Killing wolves ends their existence; it doesn’t promote coexistence.

Once we favor moving cattle instead of killing wolves, we have to look beyond WDFW and question the US Forest Service, the federal agency that issued the permit for the troubled allotment. What more would it take for the Forest Service to accept that Diamond M’s allotment is inappropriate and indefensible and the cattle should be removed? That’s such an obvious solution—if you value the lives of wolves trying to survive on public land. 

The Forest Service could even go further in promoting coexistence: make removing cattle from indefensible allotments a requirement wherever cattle conflict with wolves on Washington’s public lands. Preliminary scientific data identifying conflict hotspots in Washington exists. But the Forest Service hasn’t taken such a step. Cattle keep dying. Compensation keeps flowing. Wolves keep being shot.

It’s time to practice coexistence. It’s time to stop killing wolves and to start moving cattle. It’s time for the Forest Service and WDFW to work together to stop grazing on public land allotments that are good wolf habitat and bad cattle pasture. 

And this simple approach does not just apply to Washington—though right now that state is a shining example of the dark side of wolf “management.” This practical approach to coexistence should apply in all states that have cattle, wolves, and conflict on public lands. 

Photo Credit: Wolf photo by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Rick Lamplugh writes, photographs, and speaks to protect wildlife and wild lands.

His bestselling In the Temple of Wolves; its sequel, Deep into Yellowstone; and its prequel, The Wilds of Aging are available signed. His books are also available unsigned or as eBook or audiobook on Amazon.

Signed Sets Available





Wednesday, July 24, 2019

The Troubled Wolves of Isle Royale



Isle Royale is a small, remote island in Michigan’s Lake Superior and part of Isle Royale National Park. According to the US Census Bureau, the island has no permanent human population. But as of this May, 14 wolves call it home. Twelve were recently transported there; two are survivors of the island’s original population.

The wolves’ main meal, moose, have lived on the island since they naturally migrated there in the early 1900s and found a lot of food. Wolves, of their own accord, first walked to the island from the mainland—across 15 miles of frozen lake—in 1948, and they too found food: moose. Scientists began studying the interaction of wolves and moose in 1958. This longest predator-prey study in the world provides a lot of evidence of the importance of wolves to the ecology of the island.

While wolves have served as effective predators for decades, human-caused warming temperatures have compromised their only route to and from the island. Historically, ice bridges formed on Lake Superior and connected the island to the mainland for more than 50 days a year, according to the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA). This gave wolves the time and a way to reach the island. But over the last 20 warmer years, these bridges have been far less common. That shut the door to new wolves, stranded the island’s wolf population, and led to inbreeding, which resulted in rib and spinal deformities. Scientists say that inbred populations don’t produce viable offspring and this leads to collapse.

Maintaining enough wolves to hunt moose is essential—but difficult. The wolf population peaked at 50 in 1980 and crashed to 14 just two years later. The crash, according to the National Park Service (NPS), was caused by canine parvovirus, which came to the island via a dog. (Dogs, except service dogs, are no longer allowed on the island.) The wolf population recovered somewhat and then fell to its 2018 low of only two wolves, both related. 

With so few wolves, NPCA warns, the nearly 1,500 moose at Isle Royale could double in population over the next several years and devastate the island’s vegetation.

After extensive environmental analysis and input from scientists and the public, NPS released its Isle Royale wolf management plan. The plan was signed by then NPS Midwest Regional Director Cam Sholly. He is now the superintendent at Yellowstone National Park. The plan calls for the reintroduction of 20-30 wolves over a three-to-five-year period, beginning in 2018. The long-term average of the number of wolves on the island is 22.

Location of island wolves April 2019

But relocating wolves to Isle Royale may only be a stopgap solution, according to a recent study. Researchers found that genetic rescue—introducing new genes to increase a population’s genetic diversity—can reduce inbreeding. But Rolf Peterson, a research professor at Michigan Technological University and a member of the study’s research team, said to the Capital News Service of this rescue, “It might be 20 years, but it’s all temporary.”

The key is Lake Superior’s freezing and forming ice bridges. If climate change keeps new wolves from reaching the island, they may need to be transported there periodically. Without enough of these essential predators taking the old, young, and ill, moose will ravage the island’s forest and eventually begin to die of starvation.

Photo by Jim Peaco of NPS of wolf released on Isle Royale in October 2018

Award-winning Indie author Rick Lamplugh writes, speaks, and photographs to protect wildlife and wild lands. His bestselling In the Temple of Wolves and the award-winning sequel, Deep into Yellowstone, are available signed from Rick or unsigned on Amazon.


Rick's new book, The Wilds of Aging, is the prequel to In the Temple of Wolves and is available signed or on Amazon.